Farb, Malthus, and Ishmael v. the Population

“Peter Farb calls it a paradox: ‘Intensification of production to feed an increased population leads to a still greater increase in population.’” –Quinn, 109

Thomas Malthus, an eighteenth century economist , once predicted that because our population size increases exponentially while our food supply increases arithmetically, our population will one day exceed our ability to sustain it. While this has now been disproven with the creation of processed foods and genetically modified organisms, Farb’s paradox may hold true.   Because Earth’s population is growing, we increase our food production.  Then, because we have a surplus of food, people are more well-nourished, leading to higher life expectancies and lower infant mortality rates, and people are able to have more children.  This cyclical paradox is not healthy for our planet because while we may be able to sustain our growing population’s appetites, our other important resources, such as water and oil, are dwindling.  To have a sustainable population size, we should be reproducing at a replacement rate, much like Denmark and Japan are.

Catherine Caldwell

Leave a comment